Mefloquine in vitro P. falciparum susceptibility (Simpson 2013)
Source:vignettes/articles/Simpson_2013_mefloquine.Rmd
Simpson_2013_mefloquine.RmdModel and source
- Citation: Simpson JA, Jamsen KM, Anderson TJC, Zaloumis S, Nair S, Woodrow C, White NJ, Nosten F, Price RN. (2013). Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modelling of In Vitro Drug Susceptibility and Molecular Correlates of Multidrug Resistant Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS ONE 8(7):e69505.
- Article (open access): https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069505
This is an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of mefloquine effect on
Plasmodium falciparum parasite growth, fit to data from a
hypoxanthine-uptake-inhibition susceptibility assay on 460 P. falciparum
clinical isolates collected at the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU),
western Thai-Myanmar border, between 1993 and 2005. The “subject” in the
NLME framework is the parasite isolate. The per-record drug-well
concentration STIM_MEFLOQUINE_NM drives a sigmoid Emax
inhibition of normalised hypoxanthine uptake; the model has no PK and no
time evolution. Pfmdr1 genotype is the principal scientific covariate –
mefloquine is the drug with the largest pfmdr1 amplification effect in
the study (double-copy parasites have 139% higher EC50, triple+ 188%
higher; Table 3).
Population
- 460 P. falciparum clinical isolates with mefloquine concentration-effect data (Results paragraph 1; Table 3).
- Total cohort: 490 isolates across the four-drug study.
- Pfmdr1 genotype distribution (Table 3 mefloquine row): Genotype 1 (single-copy WT 86N/1042N) 230 isolates (50.0%), Genotype 2 (single-copy 86Y) 25 (5.4%), Genotype 3 (single-copy 1042D) 24 (5.2%), Genotype 4 (double-copy WT) 118 (25.7%), Genotype 5 (triple+ copy WT) 63 (13.7%).
- Assay: hypoxanthine-uptake inhibition (Methods, In vitro Drug Assay). Doubling-dilution series 1.62-1646.6 nM mefloquine plus drug-free controls.
Source trace
| nlmixr2 parameter | Value (typical) | Source location |
|---|---|---|
e0 (fixed) |
0.01 | Table 3 footnote #E0 fixed to 0.01
|
emax (fixed) |
0.98 | Table 3 footnote #Emax fixed to 0.98
|
lec50 (EC50 53.0 nM) |
log(53.0) | Table 3, Mefloquine Genotype 1 (WT reference) row, Estimated value (nM): 53.0 (95% CI 48.0, 58.1) |
lgamma (gamma 3.10) |
log(3.10) | Table 1, NLME row mefloquine, slope estimate 3.10 (95% reference range 1.39-6.92) |
e_pfmdr1_86y_ec50 |
-0.59 | Table 3, Mefloquine Genotype 2 percent change -59 (95% CI -72, -46) |
e_pfmdr1_1042d_ec50 |
-0.42 | Table 3, Mefloquine Genotype 3 percent change -42 (95% CI -67, -17) |
e_pfmdr1_cn2_ec50 |
1.39 | Table 3, Mefloquine Genotype 4 percent change 139 (95% CI 102, 175) |
e_pfmdr1_cn3plus_ec50 |
1.88 | Table 3, Mefloquine Genotype 5 percent change 188 (95% CI 126, 250) |
etalec50 variance |
0.56 | Table 3 footnote: between-isolate variance for EC50 = 0.56 (SE 0.043) mefloquine |
etalgamma variance |
0.41^2 = 0.1681 | Table 1 NLME mefloquine slope SD (log_e units) = 0.41 |
propSd (proportional) |
sqrt(0.010) | Table 3 footnote: proportional variance 0.010 (SE 0.0011) mefloquine |
addSd (additive) |
sqrt(0.001) | Table 3 footnote: additive variance 0.001 (SE 0.0001) mefloquine |
| Structural eq. 1 | n/a | Methods Eq. 1: E = Emax - (Emax - E0) * C^gamma / (C^gamma + EC50^gamma) |
| Random-effects eq. 2 | n/a | Methods Eq. 2 modified with theta_1..theta_4 for pfmdr1 genotypes |
| Residual eq. 3 | n/a | Methods Eq. 3 (combined additive + proportional) |
Mechanistic structure
The sigmoid Emax inhibition equation and the genotype covariate parameterisation are common across the four Simpson 2013 drugs; see the chloroquine vignette’s “Mechanistic structure” section for the equations.
For mefloquine the pfmdr1 effects are dominated by gene amplification: the 86Y SNP mutant actually has 59% lower EC50 (higher susceptibility) than WT, but every additional pfmdr1 copy roughly doubles the EC50 (double-copy +139%, triple+ +188%). This is the principal evidence motivating the well-established clinical link between Southeast-Asian pfmdr1 amplification and reduced mefloquine susceptibility.
Virtual cohort
set.seed(20260528)
genotype_grid <- tibble::tribble(
~ genotype, ~ PFMDR1_86Y, ~ PFMDR1_1042D, ~ PFMDR1_CN2, ~ PFMDR1_CN3PLUS,
"Single WT", 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L,
"Single 86Y mutant", 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L,
"Single 1042D mutant", 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L,
"Double WT", 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L,
"Triple+ WT", 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L
)
# Concentration grid: linear 0-600 nM (matches Figure 1 mefloquine x-axis).
conc_grid <- c(0, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, 500, 600)
events <- tidyr::expand_grid(genotype_grid, STIM_MEFLOQUINE_NM = conc_grid)
events$id <- seq_len(nrow(events))
events$time <- 0
events$evid <- 0
head(events, 10)
#> # A tibble: 10 × 9
#> genotype PFMDR1_86Y PFMDR1_1042D PFMDR1_CN2 PFMDR1_CN3PLUS STIM_MEFLOQUINE_NM
#> <chr> <int> <int> <int> <int> <dbl>
#> 1 Single … 0 0 0 0 0
#> 2 Single … 0 0 0 0 5
#> 3 Single … 0 0 0 0 10
#> 4 Single … 0 0 0 0 25
#> 5 Single … 0 0 0 0 50
#> 6 Single … 0 0 0 0 75
#> 7 Single … 0 0 0 0 100
#> 8 Single … 0 0 0 0 150
#> 9 Single … 0 0 0 0 200
#> 10 Single … 0 0 0 0 250
#> # ℹ 3 more variables: id <int>, time <dbl>, evid <dbl>Simulation (typical-value)
mod_fn <- readModelDb("Simpson_2013_mefloquine")
mod_typical <- rxode2::zeroRe(rxode2::rxode2(mod_fn))
#> ℹ parameter labels from comments will be replaced by 'label()'
sim <- rxode2::rxSolve(
mod_typical, events = events,
keep = c("genotype", "STIM_MEFLOQUINE_NM",
"PFMDR1_86Y", "PFMDR1_1042D", "PFMDR1_CN2", "PFMDR1_CN3PLUS")
)
#> ℹ omega/sigma items treated as zero: 'etalec50', 'etalgamma'
#> Warning: multi-subject simulation without without 'omega'
sim_df <- as.data.frame(sim) |>
dplyr::select(id, time, genotype, STIM_MEFLOQUINE_NM, ec50, gamma, effect)
head(sim_df)
#> id time genotype STIM_MEFLOQUINE_NM ec50 gamma effect
#> 1 1 0 Single WT 0 53 3.1 0.9800000
#> 2 2 0 Single WT 5 53 3.1 0.9793573
#> 3 3 0 Single WT 10 53 3.1 0.9745165
#> 4 4 0 Single WT 25 53 3.1 0.8939436
#> 5 5 0 Single WT 50 53 3.1 0.5386849
#> 6 6 0 Single WT 75 53 3.1 0.2565791
sim_df |>
ggplot(aes(STIM_MEFLOQUINE_NM, effect,
colour = genotype, linetype = genotype)) +
geom_line(linewidth = 1) +
coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0, 600), ylim = c(0, 1)) +
labs(x = "Mefloquine concentration (nM)",
y = "Estimated sigmoid inhibitory effect E",
colour = "Pfmdr1 genotype",
linetype = "Pfmdr1 genotype",
title = "Figure 1 (mefloquine panel) -- concentration-effect by genotype",
caption = "Replicates Figure 1 mefloquine panel of Simpson 2013 (typical-value).")
Comparison against published EC50 values (Table 3)
table3_obs <- tibble::tibble(
genotype = c("Single WT", "Single 86Y mutant", "Single 1042D mutant",
"Double WT", "Triple+ WT"),
ec50_obs = c(53.0, 21.7, 30.9, 126.3, 152.6)
)
table3_sim <- sim_df |>
dplyr::distinct(genotype, ec50) |>
dplyr::rename(ec50_sim = ec50)
cmp <- dplyr::left_join(table3_obs, table3_sim, by = "genotype")
cmp$pct_diff <- 100 * (cmp$ec50_sim - cmp$ec50_obs) / cmp$ec50_obs
knitr::kable(cmp, digits = 2,
caption = "Per-genotype EC50 (nM): Simpson 2013 Table 3 mefloquine row vs simulated typical-value.")| genotype | ec50_obs | ec50_sim | pct_diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single WT | 53.0 | 53.00 | 0.00 |
| Single 86Y mutant | 21.7 | 21.73 | 0.14 |
| Single 1042D mutant | 30.9 | 30.74 | -0.52 |
| Double WT | 126.3 | 126.67 | 0.29 |
| Triple+ WT | 152.6 | 152.64 | 0.03 |
Genotype effect on the EC50 shift
ratio_obs <- tibble::tibble(
genotype = c("Single 86Y mutant", "Single 1042D mutant",
"Double WT", "Triple+ WT"),
pct_obs = c(-59, -42, 139, 188),
pct_ci = c("(-72, -46)", "(-67, -17)", "(102, 175)", "(126, 250)")
)
ratio_sim <- sim_df |>
dplyr::filter(genotype != "Single WT") |>
dplyr::distinct(genotype, ec50)
ref_ec50 <- sim_df |>
dplyr::filter(genotype == "Single WT") |>
dplyr::pull(ec50) |>
unique()
ratio_sim$pct_sim <- 100 * (ratio_sim$ec50 - ref_ec50) / ref_ec50
cmp_pct <- dplyr::left_join(ratio_obs, ratio_sim, by = "genotype") |>
dplyr::select(genotype, pct_obs, pct_ci, pct_sim)
knitr::kable(cmp_pct, digits = 2,
caption = "Per-genotype EC50 percent change vs single WT: Simpson 2013 Table 3 mefloquine row (with 95% CI) vs simulated.")| genotype | pct_obs | pct_ci | pct_sim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single 86Y mutant | -59 | (-72, -46) | -59 |
| Single 1042D mutant | -42 | (-67, -17) | -42 |
| Double WT | 139 | (102, 175) | 139 |
| Triple+ WT | 188 | (126, 250) | 188 |
Assumptions and deviations
The deviations are common across the four Simpson 2013 drug-specific extractions; see the chloroquine vignette’s “Assumptions and deviations” section for the full list. Mefloquine-specific notes:
- Mefloquine is the only one of the four drugs where the 86Y SNP increases susceptibility (negative coefficient on EC50). This is consistent with the well-known clinical observation that 86Y carriers are more sensitive to mefloquine than WT parasites – the same SNP that reduces chloroquine susceptibility.
- The CN2 -> CN3+ EC50 shift is monotone for mefloquine (139% -> 188%), unlike lumefantrine where the higher copy-number group has approximately the same EC50 as the double-copy group (82% -> 75%).